Southern Poverty Law Center Intelligence Project www.splcenter.org
Intelligence Report Fall 2002 Issue 107 http://www.splcenter.org/intelligenceproject/ip-4w3.html
![]() |
| Kevin Jonas of SHAC-USA sees no need to mince words about his group’s terrorist tactics. |
A Chicago insurance executive might seem like one of the last people who'd
be opening a letter with this succinctly chilling message: “You have been
targeted for terrorist attack.” But that's what happened last year, when a top
official at Marsh USA Inc. was informed that he and his company's employees
had landed in the crosshairs of an extremist animal rights group. The reason?
Marsh provides insurance for one of the world's biggest animal testing labs.
“If you bail out now,” the letter advised, “you, your business, and your
family will be spared great hassle and humility.”
That letter - and the harassment campaign that followed, after Marsh declined
to “bail out” - was another shot fired by Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC).
This British-born group, now firmly established in the United States, is
waging war on anyone involved with Huntingdon Life Sciences, which tests drugs
on approximately 70,000 rats, dogs, monkeys and other animals each year. In
the process, SHAC is rewriting the rules by which even the most radical
eco-activists have traditionally operated.
In the past, even the edgiest American eco-warriors drew the line at targeting
humans. They trumpeted underground activists' attacks on businesses and
laboratories perceived as abusing animals or the environment - the FBI reports
more than 600 incidents, causing $43 million in damage, since 1996. But
spokespeople for the two most active groups in the U.S., the Animal Liberation
Front (ALF) and the Earth Liberation Front (ELF), have always been quick to
claim that their underground cells have never injured or killed any people.
Since 1999, however, members of both groups have been involved with SHAC's
campaign to harass employees of Huntingdon - and even distantly related
business associates like Marsh - with frankly terroristic tactics similar to
those of anti-abortion extremists. Employees have had their homes vandalized
with spray-painted “Puppy killer” and “We'll be back” notices. They have faced
a mounting number of death threats, fire bombings and violent assaults.
They've had their names, addresses and personal information posted on Web
sites and posters, declaring them “wanted for collaboration with animal
torture.”
When cowed companies began responding to the harassment by pulling away from
Huntington, many radical environmentalists cheered - even when SHAC's actions
clearly went over the “nonviolent” line. Still, the ELF and ALF insist that
they remain dedicated to what their spokespeople describe as nonviolent
“economic sabotage,” such as tree-spiking and arson. They vigorously deny the
label that increasingly sticks to them: “eco-terrorist.” Spokespeople continue
to chant the public-relations mantra that the ALF's David Barbarash invoked
again on National Public Radio this January: “There has never been a single
case where any action has resulted in injury or death.”
SHAC's escalating violence is not unique. North America's most active and
widespread eco-radicals - the ELF and ALF took credit for 137 “direct actions”
in 2001 alone - have clearly taken a turn toward the more extreme European
model of activism. The rhetoric has begun to change along with the action.
Reached by the Intelligence Report, SHAC-USA's Kevin Jonas - a former ALF
spokesman - was unusually frank about the lengths to which the new breed of
activists will go. “When push comes to shove,” Jonas said, “we're ready to
push, kick, shove, bite, do whatever to win.”
FAIR USE NOTE: In accordance with U.S. Copyright Law as codified in Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, any copyrighted material herein is displayed without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. It is posted here only after the commercial purpose of any copyright holder has been satisfied, and complies with fair use clauses of the U.S. Copyright Act. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
RETURN TO ECOTERRORISM TOP STORIES TOP PAGE
RETURN TO ECOTERRORISM TOP PAGE
RETURN TO CENTER FOR THE DEFENSE OF FREE ENTERPRISE HOME PAGE